Foundations of Physics 6 (5):539-559 (1976)

A drastic resolution of the quantum paradoxes is proposed, combining (I) von Neumann's postulate that collapse of the state vector is due to the act of observation, and (II) my reinterpretation of von Neumann's quantal irreversibility as an equivalence between wave retardation and entropy increase, both being “factlike” rather than “lawlike” (Mehlberg). This entails a coupling of the two de jure symmetries between (I) retarded and (II) advanced waves, and between Aristotle's information as (I) learning and (II) willing awareness. Symmetric acceptance of cognizance as a source of retarted waves, and of will as a sink of advanced waves, is submitted as a central “paradox” of the Copernican or Einsteinian sort, out of which new light is shed upon previously known paradoxes, such as the EPR paradox, Schrödinger's cat, and Wigner's friend. Parapsychology is thus found to creep into the picture
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00715107
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

L'evolution Creatrice.B. H. Bode - 1908 - Philosophical Review 17 (1):84-89.
Two Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics.H. P. Krips - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (2):145-152.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-Examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment.Peter Evans, Huw Price & Ken Wharton - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):297-324.
Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How the Quantum World Says “Maybe”?Huw Price - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (2):75-83.
Retrocausality at No Extra Cost.Peter William Evans - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):1139-1155.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Time-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics.K. B. Wharton - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (1):159-168.
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.John G. Cramer - 1986 - Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Quantum Mechanics From Focusing and Symmetry.Inge S. Helland - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (9):818-842.
An Overview of the Transactional Interpretation.John G. Cramer - 1988 - International Journal of Theoretical Physics 27 (227):1-5.
Schrödinger and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Fritz Rohrlich - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (12):1205-1220.
Standing Waves in the Lorentz-Covariant World.Y. S. Kim & Marilyn E. Noz - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (7):1289-1305.
Decoherence and Wave Function Collapse.Roland Omnès - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1857-1880.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #273,866 of 2,533,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #261,212 of 2,533,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes