Foundations of Physics 17 (8):775-785 (1987)

Abstract
The concept of “propagation in time” of Vigier and co-workers (V et al.) implies the idea of a supertime; it is thus alien to most Minkowskian pictures and certainly to mine. From this stems much of Vet al.'s misunderstandings of my position. In steady motion of a classical fluid nobody thinks that “momentum conservation is violated,” or that “momentum is shot upstream without cause” because of the suction from the sinks! Similarly with momentum-energy in space-time and the acceptance of an advanced causality. As for the CT invariance of the Feynman propagator, the causality asymmetry it entails is factlike, not lawlike. The geometrical counterpart of the symmetry between prediction and retrodiction and between retarded and advanced waves, as expressed in the alternative expressions 〈B|UA〉=〈BU|A〉=〈B|U|A〉 for a transition amplitude between a preparation |A〉 and a measurement |B〉, is CPT-invariant, not PT-invariant. These three expressions respectively illustrate the collapse, the retrocollapse, and the symmetric collapse-and-retrocollapse concepts. As for Sutherland's argument, what it “falsifies” is not my retrocausation concept but the hidden-variables assumption he has unwittingly made
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00733266
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Quantum Theory of Fields (Until 1947).Gregor Wentzel - 1973 - In Jagdish Mehra (ed.), The Physicist's Conception of Nature. Boston: Reidel. pp. 380--403.
Another Proof That the Future Can Influence the Present.C. W. Rietdijk - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (9-10):783-790.
Controversial Problems of Measurements Within Quantum Mechanics.J. Rayski - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (3-4):217-236.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Path Integral and Transactional Interpretation.Leonardo Chiatti - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (3):481-490.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Causality and the Arrow of Classical Time.Fritz Rohrlich - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):1-13.
Comments on a Recent Proposal by Garuccio and Vigier.O. Costa de Beauregard - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (11-12):947-948.
Wavefunction Collapse and Conservation Laws.Philip Pearle - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (8):1145-1160.
Causal Theories of Time.J. J. C. Smart - 1969 - The Monist 53 (3):385-395.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
18 ( #613,673 of 2,533,818 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #388,784 of 2,533,818 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes