Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (2):85 - 86 (2012)

Abstract
We question the plausibility of Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) argument that localised pathogen-host coevolution leads to out-groups having pathogens more damaging than those infecting one's own family or religious group
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x11000975
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Strangers Look Sicker.Paola Bressan - 2021 - Bioessays 43 (3):2000158.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dangerous Supplement/Dangerous Memory.Walter Lowe - 1986 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 61 (1):34-55.
What Are Groups?Katherine Ritchie - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):257-272.
The Metaphysics of Groups.Nikk Effingham - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):251-267.
Defining the Subject of Consent in DNA Research.Gordon R. Mitchell - 2001 - Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):41-53.
Hyperlinear and Sofic Groups: A Brief Guide.Vladimir G. Pestov - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):449-480.
Aesthetics Contagion: The Kitsch and Glamour Pathogens.Katya Mandoki - 2003 - Dialogue and Universalism 13 (11-12):141-150.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
18 ( #613,582 of 2,533,574 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #199,858 of 2,533,574 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes