Are the pathogens of out-groups really more dangerous?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (2):85 - 86 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We question the plausibility of Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) argument that localised pathogen-host coevolution leads to out-groups having pathogens more damaging than those infecting one's own family or religious group

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dangerous Supplement/Dangerous Memory.Walter Lowe - 1986 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 61 (1):34-55.
What are groups?Katherine Ritchie - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):257-272.
The metaphysics of groups.Nikk Effingham - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):251-267.
Defining the Subject of Consent in DNA Research.Gordon R. Mitchell - 2001 - Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):41-53.
Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide.Vladimir G. Pestov - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):449-480.
Aesthetics Contagion: The Kitsch and Glamour Pathogens.Katya Mandoki - 2003 - Dialogue and Universalism 13 (11-12):141-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?