The value of humanity in Kant's moral theory

New York: Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The humanity formulation of Kant's Categorical Imperative demands that we treat humanity as an end in itself. Because this principle resonates with currently influential ideals of human rights and dignity, contemporary readers often find it compelling, even if the rest of Kant's moral philosophy leaves them cold. Moreover, some prominent specialists in Kant's ethics have recently turned to the humanity formulation as the most theoretically central and promising principle of Kant's ethics. Nevertheless, it has received less attention than many other aspects of Kant's ethics. Richard Dean offers the most sustained and systematic examination of the humanity formulation to date. He presents an original analysis of what it means to treat humanity as an end in itself, and examines the implications both for Kant scholarship and for practical guidance on specific moral issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Is the Good Will Reading Just Too Hard to Swallow?

Despite the evidence for the good will reading of the humanity formulation, many readers will find it unpalatable. It may seem that if good will is the end in itself, then the humanity formulation allows the abuse of many humans who are insufficiently committed to morality. But Kant’s own ... see more

How Duties Follow from the Categorical Imperative

Kant recognizes that even if one accepts the humanity formulation as a basic moral principle, there is a further task of applying the principle to derive more specific categories of duties. Kant refers to the more complete system of duties as a ‘metaphysics of morals’. It is argued that th... see more

Similar books and articles

Glasgow’s Conception of Kantian Humanity.Richard Dean - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 307-314.
Did Kant respect persons?Michael Neumann - 2000 - Res Publica 6 (3):285-299.
Kant's ethics and duties to oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
Why must we treat humanity with respect? Evaluating the regress argument.Michael Ridge - 2005 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1 (1):57-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
221 (#87,069)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Dean
California State University, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

An Epistemic Non-Consequentialism.Kurt L. Sylvan - 2020 - The Philosophical Review 129 (1):1-51.
Reliabilism without Epistemic Consequentialism.Kurt L. Sylvan - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):525-555.
Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity.Paul Formosa & Catriona Mackenzie - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):875-892.
Kant's moral philosophy.Robert N. Johnson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references