Dehumanization or the Disappearance of Pluralism?

Diogenes 49 (195):34-37 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ‘dehuman’ and the inhuman are not, even partially, exterior to the human, as are the material and the living, the animal and the bestial; they represent rather the extremes, the very limits of the human. The inhuman forms the interior facet of the boundary which makes us human and concerns us as such. In that sense, it is never exterior to us.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The new face of humanity.Robert Redeker - 2007 - Bethesda: Academica Press.
Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.
Eliminative pluralism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):671-690.
The evolution of sex: Domains and explanatory pluralism.Carla Fehr - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (2):145-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
95 (#177,613)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references