Cartesian analyticity

Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):47-55 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The syllogism and the predicate calculus cannot account for an ontological argument in Descartes' Fifth Meditation and related texts. Descartes' notion of god relies on the analytic-synthetic distinction, which Descartes had identified before Leibniz and Kant did. I describe how the syllogism and the predicate calculus cannot explain Descartes' ontological argument; then I apply the analytic-synthetic distinction to Descartes’ idea of god.

Similar books and articles

The importance of cartesian triangles: A new look at Descartes's ontological argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
Quine, analyticity and philosophy of mathematics.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):38–55.
Proofs for the Existence of God.Lawrence Nolan & Alan Nelson - 2006 - In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), The Blackwell to Descartes’ Meditations. Blackwell. pp. 104--121.
Analyticity reconsidered.Paul Artin Boghossian - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):360-391.
Kant’s Conception of Analytic Judgment.Ian Proops - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):588–612.
Analyticity.George Bealer - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 234-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
473 (#38,654)

6 months
67 (#64,592)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jesus A. Diaz
Brown University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references