Minds and Machines 10 (2):171-201 (2000)
Abstract |
This paper examines whether a classical model could be translated into a PDP network using a standard connectionist training technique called extra output learning. In Study 1, standard machine learning techniques were used to create a decision tree that could be used to classify 8124 different mushrooms as being edible or poisonous on the basis of 21 different Features (Schlimmer, 1987). In Study 2, extra output learning was used to insert this decision tree into a PDP network being trained on the identical problem. An interpretation of the trained network revealed a perfect mapping from its internal structure to the decision tree, representing a precise translation of the classical theory to the connectionist model. In Study 3, a second network was trained on the mushroom problem without using extra output learning. An interpretation of this second network revealed a different algorithm for solving the mushroom problem, demonstrating that the Study 2 network was indeed a proper theory translation.
|
Keywords | cognitive science connectionist theories symbolic theories |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2004 |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1008313828824 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.
On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.
Reduction, Qualia and the Direct Introspection of Brain States.Paul M. Churchland - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (January):8-28.
A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.Warren S. McCulloch & Walter Pitts - 1943 - The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5 (4):115-133.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Content and Its Vehicles in Connectionist Systems.Nicholas Shea - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (3):246–269.
On the Subsymbolic Nature of a PDP Architecture That Uses a Nonmonotonic Activation Function.Michael R. W. Dawson & C. Darren Piercey - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):197-218.
Similar books and articles
Representational Trajectories in Connectionist Learning.Andy Clark - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (3):317-32.
PDP Networks Can Provide Models That Are Not Mere Implementations of Classical Theories.Michael R. W. Dawson, David A. Medler & Istvan S. N. Berkeley - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):25-40.
Expert Networks: Paradigmatic Conflict, Technological Rapproachement. [REVIEW]R. C. Lacher - 1993 - Minds and Machines 3 (1):53-71.
Strong Semantic Systematicity From Hebbian Connectionist Learning.Robert F. Hadley & M. B. Hayward - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (1):1-55.
Connectionist Hysteria: Reducing a Freudian Case Study to a Network Model.Dan Lloyd - 1994 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 1 (2):69-88.
On the Subsymbolic Nature of a PDP Architecture That Uses a Nonmonotonic Activation Function.Michael R. W. Dawson & C. Darren Piercey - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):197-218.
The Allure of Connectionism Reexamined.Brian P. McLaughlin & F. Warfield - 1994 - Synthese 101 (3):365-400.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
14 ( #728,625 of 2,498,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,570 )
2009-01-28
Total views
14 ( #728,625 of 2,498,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,570 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads