Cognition and conditioning: Effects of masking the CS-UCS contingency on human GSR classical conditioning

Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (3):389 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0029715

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

I Like It, but I'm Not Sure Why: Can Evaluative Conditioning Occur without Conscious Awareness?Andy P. Field - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (1):13-36.
Comparison of classical conditioning and relational learning.Michael E. Dawson & William W. Grings - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (2p1):227.
Abolition of the PRE by instructions in GSR conditioning.Wagner H. Bridger & Irwin J. Mandel - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (5):476.
Backward masking of conditioned stimuli: Effects on differential and single-cue classical conditioning performance.Leonard E. Ross, M. Cecilia Ferreira & Susan M. Ross - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):603.
Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: A distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.Michael N. Nelson & Leonard E. Ross - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):1.
Evaluative conditioning is Pavlovian conditioning: Issues of definition, measurement, and the theoretical importance of contingency awareness.Andy P. Field - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (1):41-49.
Effect of instructions upon eyelid conditioning.Margaret F. Nicholls & Gregory A. Kimble - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):400.
Effect of instructions on responsiveness to the CS and to the UCS in GSR conditioning.Brian Harvey & Delos D. Wickens - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (1):137.
Separate-phase differential eyelid conditioning within the context of a masking procedure.M. J. Homzie - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):630.
Effects of trace versus delay conditioning, interstimulus interval variability, and instructions on UCR diminution.William W. Grings & Anne M. Schell - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):136.
Effects of stimulus complexity, interstimulus interval, and masking task conditions in differential eyelid conditioning.Melanie J. Mayer & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):469.
Human Pavlovian autonomie conditioning and its relation to awareness of the CS/US contingency: Focus on the phenomenon and some forgotten facts.John J. Furedy & Magnus Kristjansson - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):555-556.
Reversal of differential gsr conditioning by instructions.Glenn D. Wilson - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):491.
Temporal conditioning as a function of instructions and intertrial interval.J. Preston Harley - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (1):178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#875,539)

6 months
2 (#1,244,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references