A bayesian analysis of Hume's argument concerning miracles

&
Philosophical Quarterly 39 (154):57-65 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2220350

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hume versus Price on miracles and prior probabilities: Testimony and the Bayesian calculation.David Owen - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (147):187-202.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Hume on miracles: Bayesian interpretation, multiple testimony, and the existence of God.Rodney D. Holder - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):49-65.
Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2004 - Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
A Dissertation on Miracles.George Campbell - 1839 - Garland.
On the evidence of testimony for miracles: A bayesian interpretation of David Hume's analysis.Jordan Howard Sobel - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (147):166-186.
Mackie's treatment of miracles.Richard Otte - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
306 (#63,035)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Donald Gillies
University College London
Philip Dawid
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Hume and the Independent Witnesses.Arif Ahmed - 2015 - Mind 124 (496):1013-1044.
Hume on probability.Barry Gower - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):1-19.
David Hume's no-miracles argument begets a valid No-Miracles Argument.Colin Howson - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:41-45.
A Bayesian proof of a Humean principle.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):255-256.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references