Warner on Enjoyment

Philosophy Research Archives 12:553-555 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘Davis on Enjoyment: A Reply’, Richard Warner replies to three objections against his ‘Enjoyment’ that I raised in my ‘A Causal Theory of Enjoyment’, and concludes that one of my examples in fact demonstrates a serious deficiency of my own account. I argue that Warner’s replies to my objections are unsatisfactory, and that his objection to my account had a ready solution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Warner on Enjoyment.Wayne A. Davis - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:553-555.
Davis on enjoyment: A reply.Richard Warner - 1983 - Mind 92 (368):568-572.
A causal theory of enjoyment.Wayne A. Davis - 1982 - Mind 91 (April):240-256.
Enjoyment.Richard Warner - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (4):507-526.
Freedom, Enjoyment, and Happiness. [REVIEW]Sarah Conly - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (3):465-468.
Hedonism Reconsidered.Roger Crisp - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):619-645.
The Concept of Enjoyment.Howard Leonard Lehman - 1982 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Hedonism reconsidered.Roger Crisp - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):619–645.
Logics of Enjoyment in Tabloid Discourse.Wei-Yuan Chang - 2011 - International Journal of Žižek Studies 5 (4).
Reflections on Enjoyment.Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - 1985 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 28 (4):489-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wayne Davis
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references