Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=Mc2

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (1):1-2 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.11.001

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=Mc2.N. David Mermin - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (1):1-2.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
Einstein’s 1935 Derivation of E=mc2.Francisco Flores - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (2):223-243.
Einstein’s Miraculous Argument of 1905: The Thermodynamic Grounding of Light Quanta.John D. Norton - 2007
On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago.Jeroen van Dongen - 2009 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (6):655-663.
EINSTEIN’S 1905 ‘REVOLUTIONARY’ PAPER ON QUANTA AS A MANIFEST AND DETAILED EXAMPLE OF A ‘PRINCIPLE THEORY’.Drago Antonino - 2014 - Advances in Historical Studies (No.3).
Wśród książek [recenzja] P.J. E Peebles, The Large - Scale Structure of the Universe, 1980. A. J. Miller, Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity: Emergence (1905) and Early Interpretation (1905-1911), 1981. M. Jammer, Das Problem des Raumes -. [REVIEW]Michał Heller - 1982 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 4.
Reflections on Light and Time in the Philosophy of Franciscus Patricius and in the 1905 Paper of Albert Einstein “The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”.Eugene E. Ryan - 2006 - Synthesis Philosophica 21 (2):195-208.
Bohr's discussion of the fourth uncertainty relation revisited.O. Costa de Beauregard - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (9):937-939.
The Mystery of the Einstein–Poincaré Connection.Olivier Darrigol - 2004 - Isis 95:614-626.
Piaget, Einstein, and the Concept of Time.Tilman Sauer - unknown
The transition from Newtonian particle mechanics to relativistic field mechanics.Michel Janssen - unknown
Einstein, the reality of space, and the action-reaction principle.Dennis Lehmkuhl, P. Ghose & Harvey Brown - unknown
Poincare's contributions to relativistic dynamics.Galina Granek - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):15-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
25 (#598,332)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Did Einstein prove E=mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
Did Einstein prove E=mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.

Add more references