Reply to Ohanian's comment

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.01.002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Ohanian's comment.N. David Mermin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
Ng and Singer on Utilitarianism: A Reply.Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):241 - 242.
Reply to Gao’s ”Comment on ”How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements”.Jos Uffink - unknown
A comment on Hochberg's reply to Storer.David Karl Kauf - 1954 - Philosophical Studies 5 (4):57 - 58.
The natural rights debate: A comment on a reply.David Osterfeld - 1983 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 7 (1):101-13.
Did Einstein prove< i> E=< i> mc< sup> 2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
Did Einstein prove E=mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
Dispositivo de gobierno, memoria y subjetividad: Un abordaje posible.Bárbara Inés Ohanian - 2012 - Aletheia: Anuario de Filosofía 2 (4):10 - 18.
Reply to Van Inwagen.Richard Foley - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):101-103.
A Reply to Professor Flew's Comment.J. W. N. Watkins - 1957 - Analysis 18 (2):41 - 42.
Reply to Dummett's Comment.Hilary Putnam - 1979 - In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use. Reidel. pp. 226--228.
Comment on Professor Mackay's Reply.C. J. F. Williams - 1960 - Analysis 21 (4):84 - 85.
Saunders and Wallace reply.Simon Saunders & David Wallace - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):315-317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.

Add more references