Progress in Literary Study

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:141 - 148 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Literary study has been thought incapable of progress because its aims and standards were thought to depend too highly on the value assumptions of the culture which fostered it to permit progress across cultures and across centuries. Max Weber proposed a strategy for working toward objective knowledge and progress in the social sciences generally, which can be applied to literary study. The Weberian strategy is to make the value assumptions behind a given theory explicit. Applying the Weberian strategy to literary study will enable us to make our knowledge of literature and of literary study more objective because we can replace a model of chaotic and incommensurable work with a model of competing research programs in literary study and we can then learn to compare and improve these programs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Literary scholarship.Norman Foerster, John Calvin McGalliard, René Wellek, Austin Warren & Wilbur Schramm (eds.) - 1941 - Chapel Hill,: The University of North Carolina Press.
Kenneth Burke: rhetoric, subjectivity, postmodernism.Robert Wess - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Literary theory: a practical introduction.Michael Ryan (ed.) - 2007 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Literary critics in a new era.Martin Paulsen - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):251 - 260.
The end of literary theory.Stein Haugom Olsen - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
6 (#1,430,516)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references