- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Mind, Value, and Cosmos: On the Relational Nature of Ultimacy
Lanham: Lexington Books (2020)
Abstract
A engaging dialogue with the modern “axionoetic” proposals of A.N. Whitehead, Keith Ward, and John Leslie, arguing for the relational nature of ultimacy wherein Mind and Value, Possibility and Actuality, God and the World are affirmed as ultimate only in virtue of their relationality. This relationship Whitehead calls “mutual immanence.”
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Indeterminacy, ultimacy, and the world: The self-creation of religious pluralism through community and creation. [REVIEW]Benjamin James Chicka - 2010 - Sophia 49 (1):49-63.
Color properties and color ascriptions: A relationalist manifesto.Jonathan Cohen - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (4):451-506.
Wandering beneath Sacred Canopies: Robert C. Neville's Systematic Theology.David Chai - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 67 (1):267-273.
Mind and the Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False.Keith Ward - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):207-209.
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False.Itay Shani - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):294-298.
Whitehead's Cosmology- Process Relational Perspective to Relativity and Quantum Theory.Deepak Bansal - 2018 - Cosmos and History 14 (1):27-39.
Comments on Keith Ward’s Christ and the Cosmos.Stephen T. Davis - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):307-312.
The Mind-Dependence of the Relational Structure of Time (or: What Henri Bergson Would Say to B-theorists).Sonja Deppe - 2016 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):107-124.
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False by Thomas Nagel.Józef Bremer - 2012 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 17 (2):269-273.
Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead.C. Robert Mesle - 2008 - Templeton Press.
Evolutionary naturalism and the logical structure of valuation: The other side of error theory.Richard A. Richards - 2005 - Cosmos and History 1 (2):270-294.
Relational Creativity and the Symmetry of Freedom and Nature.Philip Michael Rose - 2005 - Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 1 (1):3-16.
Thomas Nagel: Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. [REVIEW]Logan Paul Gage - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (3):588-590.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-07-27
Downloads
7 (#1,316,802)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
2020-07-27
Downloads
7 (#1,316,802)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo