In What Ways Is 'The New Imperialism' Really New?

Historical Materialism 15 (3):57-70 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay argues that it is a matter of vital concern to develop a theoretical apparatus that is adequate to the inherent spatiotemporal dynamics of capital accumulation and the changing practices developed to manage the crisis tendencies of those dynamics. This requires integrating the a-spatial theory of capital accumulation and its internal contradictions with the spatial/geographical theory of imperialism that invokes geopolitical and geo-economic struggles between nation-states. I argue that the two are linked by the way capital deals with the problem of absorbing capital surpluses, namely through geographical fixes. The geographical fix requires imperialist expansionism and the battering down of all barriers to the spatial movement of capital. Such a conception provides the necessary clarity in formulating the relations between capital and state that are sometimes missing from Ellen M. Wood's arguments in Empire of Capital.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
177 (#103,834)

6 months
12 (#131,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Harvey
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Imperialism in Context.Claude Serfati - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (2):52-93.
The Governance of Economies and the Economics of Governance.Safi Shams - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (1):179-190.
Los cambios en la rivalidad interimperial”.Claudio Katz - 2007 - Historical Materialism 15 (3):2.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references