How do we know what babies know? The limits of inferring cognitive representations from visual fixation data

Philosophical Psychology 34 (2):182-209 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most infant cognitive studies use visual fixation time as the measure of interest. There are, however, some serious methodological and theoretical concerns regarding what these studies reveal about infant cognition and how their results ought to be interpreted. We propose a Bayesian modeling framework which helps address these concerns. This framework allows us to more precisely formulate hypotheses about infants’ cognitive representations, formalize “linking hypotheses” that relate infants’ visual fixation behavior with stimulus complexity, and better determine what questions a given experiment can and cannot answer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Visual Data – Reasons to Be Relied on?Nicola Mößner - 2017 - In Nicola Mößner & Alfred Nordmann (eds.), Reasoning in Measurement. New York: Routledge. pp. 99-110.
Visual memory from eye fixation to eye fixation.J. Palmer & C. T. Ames - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):510-510.
Attention, Fixation, and Change Blindness.Tony Cheng - 2017 - Philosophical Inquiries 5 (1):19-26.
The existence of internal visual memory representations.Jennifer D. Ryan & Neal J. Cohen - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1002-1003.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-30

Downloads
41 (#369,691)

6 months
13 (#165,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Isaac Davis
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations