Glyn Humphreys: Attention, Binding, Motion-Induced Blindness

Mind and Language 32 (2):127-154 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Glyn Humphreys' research on attention and binding began from feature-integration theory, which claims that binding together visual features, such as colour and orientation, requires spatially selective attention. Humphreys employed a more inclusive notion of binding and argued, on neuropsychological grounds, for a multi-stage account of the overall binding process, in which binding together of form elements was followed by two stages of feature binding. Only the second stage of feature binding, a re-entrant process beginning in posterior parietal cortex and returning to early visual areas, required attention. In line with his commitment to converging evidence, Humphreys considered that investigating the role of attention in motion-induced blindness could be a route to better understanding of the cognitive role of the attention-dependent second stage of feature binding. He suggested that this role might be to resolve ambiguity and to generate a single consistent interpretation of the perceptual input.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuropsychological Analogies Of Inattentional Blindness.Glyn Humphreys - 2000 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 6.
New motion-induced blindness observed in Pulfrich situation.H. Li - 2004 - In Robert Schwartz (ed.), Perception. Malden Ma: Blackwell. pp. 82-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-07

Downloads
5 (#1,170,023)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations