Feminism and the Flat Law Theory

Feminist Legal Studies 16 (3):281-304 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines two modalities of law, depicted spatially as the vertical and the horizontal. The intellectual background for seeing law in vertical and horizontal dimensions is to be found in much socio-legal scholarship. These approaches have challenged the modernist, legal positivist and essentially vertical view of law as a system of imperatives emanating from a hierarchically superior source such as a sovereign. In keeping with the socio-legal critical tradition, but approaching it from the perspective of legal philosophy, my aim is to address three matters. First, why is vertical law problematic for feminists? Second, what are the theoretical characteristics of law in its horizontal register? Third, how is an appreciation of this ‘flat’ law useful for feminist legal theory and practice? In particular, I consider the ways in which feminist legal theory operating in the horizontal dimension can transgress, without transcending, the vertically determined perimeters of the nation state

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
The autonomy of law: essays on legal positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Between natural law and legal positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on legal theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Legal positivism.Mario Jori (ed.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
On legal order: Some criticism of the received view. [REVIEW]Riccardo Guastini - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
96 (#173,363)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Margaret Davies
Flinders University

References found in this work

Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Natural law and natural rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Practical reason and norms.Joseph Raz - 1975 - London: Hutchinson.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 17 references / Add more references