Eighteen rules for writing a code of professional ethics

Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):171-189 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most professional societies, scientific associations, and the like that undertake to write a code of ethics do so using other codes as models but without much (practical) guidance about how to do the work. The existing literature on codes is much more concerned with content than procedure. This paper adds to guidance already in the literature what I learned from participating in the writing of an important code of ethics. The guidance is given in the form of “rules” each of which is explained and (insofar as possible) justified. The emphasis is on procedure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact? [REVIEW]Mark S. Frankel - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):109 - 115.
Ethical Principles vs. Ethical Rules.Terri L. Herron & David L. Gilbertson - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):499-523.
A draft model aggregated code of ethics for bioethicists.Robert Baker - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):33 – 41.
Ethics in tourism-reality or hallucination.Marilynn P. Fleckenstein & Patricia Huebsch - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):137 - 142.
It’s Time for Principles-Based Accounting Ethics.Albert D. Spalding & Alfonso Oddo - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):49-59.
What can we learn by looking for the first code of professional ethics?Michael Davis - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):433-454.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
137 (#122,189)

6 months
7 (#172,048)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Davis
State University of New York at Buffalo