Empiricism in arithmetic and analysis

Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):53-66 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss the philosophical status of the statement that (9n – 1) is divisible by 8 for various sizes of the number n. We argue that even this simple problem reveals deep tensions between truth and verification. Using Gillies's empiricist classification of theories into levels, we propose that statements in arithmetic should be classified into three different levels depending on the sizes of the numbers involved. We conclude by discussing the relationship between the real number system and the physical continuum.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#208,367)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Davies
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Some remarks on the foundations of quantum theory.E. B. Davies - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):521-539.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Perception and mathematical intuition.Penelope Maddy - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (2):163-196.
Foundations of Constructive Analysis.Errett Bishop - 1967 - New York, NY, USA: Mcgraw-Hill.
The Reliability of Randomized Algorithms.D. Fallis - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):255-271.
An empiricist philosophy of mathematics and its implications for the history of mathematics.Donald Gillies - 2000 - In Emily Grosholz & Herbert Breger (eds.), The growth of mathematical knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 41--57.

Add more references