In Luca Maria Aiello & Daniel McFarland (eds.), Social Informatics: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference (SocInfo 2014). Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 8851. pp. 428-443 (2014)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Interest has been revived in the creation of a "bill of rights" for Internet users. This paper analyzes users' rights into ten broad principles, as a basis for assessing what users regard as important and for comparing different multi-issue Internet policy proposals. Stability of the principles is demonstrated in an experimental survey, which also shows that freedoms of users to participate in the design and coding of platforms appear to be viewed as inessential relative to other rights. An analysis of users' rights frameworks that have emerged over the past twenty years similarly shows that such proposals tend to leave out freedoms related to software platforms, as opposed to user data or public networks. Evaluating policy frameworks in a comparative analysis based on prior principles may help people to see what is missing and what is important as the future of the Internet continues to be debated.
|
Keywords | digital rights privacy data portability free software open source participatory design user self-governance freedom of information net neutrality user attitudes |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Freedoms of Software and its Ethical Uses.Samir Chopra & Scott Dexter - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):287-297.
A Bundle of Software Rights and Duties.David M. Douglas - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):185-197.
The Social Disutility of Software Ownership.David M. Douglas - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):485-502.
Spyware – the Ethics of Covert Software.Mathias Klang - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (3):193-202.
A persistent data tracking mechanism for user-centric identity governance.Hidehito Gomi - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):639-656.
Layering Privacy on Operating Systems, Social Networks, and Other Platforms by Design.Dawn N. Jutla - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):319-341.
User Interfaces for Communication Bridges Across the Digital Divide.Edwin H. Blake & William D. Tucker - 2006 - AI and Society 20 (2):232-242.
Privacy and Social Networking Technology.Richard A. Spinello - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 16:12.
A User Profiling Component with the Aid of User Ontologies.Istvan-Tibor Nébel - 2003 - In Proceedings of Learning - Teaching - Knowledge - Adaptivity. University of Karlsruhe.
How to Approximate Users' Values While Preserving Privacy: Experiences with Using Attitudes Towards Work Tasks as Proxies for Personal Value Elicitation. [REVIEW]Sven H. Koch, Rumyana Proynova, Barbara Paech & Thomas Wetter - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (1):45-61.
The PROTEVS Approach: A Short Presentation of Background, Principles and Methods. [REVIEW]Siv Friis - 1995 - AI and Society 9 (2-3):193-207.
Copyright or Copyleft?: An Analysis of Property Regimes for Software Development.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Research Policy 34 (10):1511-1532.
From Participatory Design to Participating Problem Solving: Enhancing System Adaptability Through User Modelling. [REVIEW]Zhengxin Chen - 1993 - AI and Society 7 (3):238-247.
Trust and privacy in the future internet—a research perspective.Dirk van Rooy & Jacques Bus - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):397-404.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-07-29
Total views
239 ( #46,358 of 2,505,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #24,846 of 2,505,624 )
2015-07-29
Total views
239 ( #46,358 of 2,505,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #24,846 of 2,505,624 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads