Conscientious refusal and a doctors's right to quit

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):75 – 91 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patients sometimes request procedures their doctors find morally objectionable. Do doctors have a right of conscientious refusal? I argue that conscientious refusal is justified only if the doctor's refusal does not make the patient worse off than she would have been had she gone to another doctor in the first place. From this approach I derive conclusions about the duty to refer and facilitate transfer, whether doctors may provide 'moral counseling,' whether doctors are obligated to provide objectionable procedures when no other doctor is available, why the moral consensus among doctors seems relevant even though it does not determine whether something is morally acceptable, and whether doctors should stay out of fields whose standard procedures they find morally unacceptable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#153,977)

6 months
3 (#211,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John K. Davis
California State University, Fullerton

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references