Computer-Aided Argument Mapping as a Tool for Teaching Critical Thinking

International Journal of Learning and Media 4 (3-4):79-84 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As individuals we often face complex issues about which we must weigh evidence and come to conclusions. Corporations also have to make decisions on the basis of strong and compelling arguments. Legal practitioners, compelled by arguments for or against a proposition and underpinned by the weight of evidence, are often required to make judgments that affect the lives of others. Medical doctors face similar decisions. Governments make purchasing decisions—for example, for expensive military equipment—or decisions in the areas of public or foreign policy. These issues involve many arguments on all sides of difficult debates. These issues involve understanding the arguments of others and being able to make objections and provide rebuttals to objections. Students in universities deal with arguments all the time. A major purpose of a university education—regardless of subject matter—is to teach students how to read, understand, and respond to complex arguments. The ability to do this makes for highly employable, adaptable, and reflectively critical individuals. We often call the skill of marshaling arguments and assessing them “critical thinking.” All universities claim to instill the skill of critical thinking in their graduates and routinely note this in their advertising and promotional documents. This short paper outlines one way this skill can be taught.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Computer-Aided Argument Mapping and the Teaching of Critical Thinking (Part 1).Martin Davies - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):15-30.
Computer-Aided Argument Mapping and the Teaching of Critical Thinking (Part 2).Martin Davies - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):16-28.
'Not Quite Right': Helping Students to Make Better Arguments.W. Martin Davies - 2008 - Teaching in Higher Education 13 (3):327-340.
Argument maps improve critical thinking.Charles Twardy - 2004 - Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116.
Mapping Decisions and Arguments.Peter A. Facione & Carol Ann Gittens - 2015 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 30 (2):17-53.
Judicial System Resources: More Fun and Better Understanding in the Critical Thinking Classroom.Bruce Waller - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (2):4-13.
Critical Thinking: Teaching and Assessing It.Alec Fisher - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (1):4-16.
From Argument and Philosophy to Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum.Gerald Nosich - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (3):4-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-26

Downloads
538 (#30,685)

6 months
78 (#49,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Davies
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references