A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism †We should like to thank D. Bridges for helpful comments

Philosophia Mathematica 13 (3):252-276 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We approach the philosophy of mathematics via a discussion of the differences between classical mathematics and constructive mathematics, arguing that each is a valid activity within its own context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Definitive Constructive Open Mapping Theorem?Douglas Bridges & Hajime Ishihara - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (4):545-552.
Proofs and arguments: The special case of mathematics.Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):157-169.
The swap of integral and limit in constructive mathematics.Rudolf Taschner - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (5):533-540.
Intentional mathematics.Stewart Shapiro (ed.) - 1985 - New YorK, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Can constructive mathematics be applied in physics?Douglas S. Bridges - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):439-453.
Constructing local optima on a compact interval.Douglas S. Bridges - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (2):149-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
143 (#125,844)

6 months
23 (#111,949)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Davies
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Mathematical pluralism.G. Priest - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (1):4-13.
The Quasi-Empirical Epistemology of Mathematics.Ellen Yunjie Shi - 2022 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):207-226.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references