Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture

Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):291-297 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This opinion paper takes aim at an error made recently by Clarivate Analytics in which it sent out an email that congratulated academics for becoming exclusive members of academia’s most cited elite, the Highly Cited Researchers. However, that email was sent out to an undisclosed number of non-HCRs, who were offered an apology shortly after, through a bulk mail, which tried to down-play the importance of the error, all the while praising the true HCRs. When Clarivate Analytics senior management was contacted, the company declined to offer an indication of the number of academics who had been contacted and erroneously awarded the HCR status. We believe that this regrettable blunder, together with the opacity offered by the company, fortify the corporate attitude about the value of the journal impact factor, and what it represents, namely a marketing tool that is falsely used to equate citations with quality, worth, or influence. The continued commercialization of metrics such as the JIF is at the heart of their use to assess the “quality” of a researcher, their work, or a journal, and contributes to a great extent to driving scientific activities towards a futile endeavor.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Disaster of the Impact Factor.Khaled Moustafa - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):139-142.
Aberration of the Citation.Khaled Moustafa - 2016 - Accountability in Research 23 (4):230.
The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty.E. J. Wagena - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):308-308.
The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful.Gonzalo Génova, Hernán Astudillo & Anabel Fraga - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):227-235.
Lost in publication: how measurement harms science.Peter A. Lawrence - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):9-11.
The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks.Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.
Analysis and Science in Aristotle.Patrick Hugh Byrne - 1997 - State University of New York Press.
Le kitāb al-Ta līl d'Alfarabi.Dominique Mallet - 1994 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (2):317.
The Relationship of aristotle's Two Analytics.Robin Smith - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (2):327-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-25

Downloads
22 (#673,588)

6 months
2 (#1,182,310)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references