The Historians' Disagreements over the Meaning of Planck's Quantum

Centaurus 43 (3-4):219-239 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Planck, the Quantum, and the Historians.Clayton A. Gearhart - 2002 - Physics in Perspective 4 (2):170--215.
Planck-scale physics: Facts and beliefs. [REVIEW]Diego Meschini - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (4):277-294.
Pre-socratic quantum gravity.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 2001 - In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press. pp. 213--55.
Can Quantum Gravity be Exposed in the Laboratory?Jacob D. Bekenstein - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (5):452-462.
Ludwig Boltzmann und Das grundlagenproblem der quantentheorie.Ulrich Hoyer - 1984 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):201-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-13

Downloads
10 (#1,026,208)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Between classical and quantum.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2007 - Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2:417--553.
Heuristics versus norms: On the relativistic responses to the Kaufmann experiments.Jan Potters - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66:69-89.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references