Replies to Mercier and Oaksford

Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):500-504 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Replies to Hugo Mercier’s and Mike Oaksford’s comments on my paper “Why Do Humans Reason? A Pragmatic Supplement to an Argumentative Theory,” Thinking & Reasoning (August-November 2013) 472-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.802256.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/13546783.2013.819377

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bayesian argumentation and the pragmatic approach: Comment on Darmstadter.Mike Oaksford - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):495-499.
Dynamic inference and everyday conditional reasoning in the new paradigm.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):346-379.
The function of reasoning: Argumentative and pragmatic alternatives.Hugo Mercier - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):488-494.
A manual of modern scholastic philosophy.Désiré Mercier, Désiré Nys, Jean Halleux, M. de Wulf, Thomas Leo Parker & Stanislaus Anselm Parker (eds.) - 1928 - St. Louis,: B. Herder book company.
Theories of reasoning and the representational level: A reply to Oaksford.Carlos Santamar - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (2):209 – 213.
Cardinal Mercier's philosophical essays: a study in neo-Thomism.Désiré Mercier - 2002 - [Herent, Belgium]: Peeters. Edited by David A. Boileau.
Why do humans reason? A pragmatist supplement to an argumentative theory.Howard Darmstadter - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):472-487.
Dr. Mercier and the logicians.Charles A. Mercier - 1914 - Mind 23 (1):564-567.
Mercier's Reply to Lee.Adèle Mercier - 2008 - The Monist 91 (3-4):439-441.
Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies.Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):132-159.
Rational argument, rational inference.Ulrike Hahn, Adam J. L. Harris & Mike Oaksford - 2012 - Argument and Computation 4 (1):21 - 35.
Two and three stage models of deontic reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (4):350 – 357.
Theories of reasoning and the computational explanation of everyday inference.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (2):121 – 152.
Scope ambiguities and conditionals.David Over, Igor Douven & Sara Verbrugge - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):284-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-18

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Darmstadter
Princeton University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
What good is moral reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.

View all 9 references / Add more references