Indiscernibility and perception: A reply to Joseph Margolis

British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (4):321-329 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Farewell to Danto and Goodman.Joseph Margolis - 1998 - British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (4):353-374.
Aesthetic perception.Joseph Margolis - 1960 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19 (2):209-213.
Sibley on aesthetic perception.Joseph Margolis - 1966 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (2):155-158.
A closer look at Danto's account of art and perception.J. Margolis - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3):326-339.
Pain and perception.Joseph Margolis - 1976 - International Studies in Philosophy 8:3-12.
Perception, inference, and mediation.Joseph Margolis - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (4):119-123.
The Radical Nature of Margolis’ Relativism.B. Richard Beatch - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
168 (#106,470)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references