BackgroundReports suggest that some health care personnel fear retaliation from seeking ethics consultation. We therefore examined the prevalence and determinants of fear of retaliation and determined whether this fear is associated with diminished likelihood of consulting an ethics committee.MethodsWe surveyed registered nurses (RNs) and social workers (SWs) in four US states to identify ethical problems they encounter. We developed a retaliation index (1–7 point range) with higher scores indicating a higher perceived likelihood of retaliation. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify socio-demographic and job characteristics associated with fear of retaliation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether fear of retaliation was associated with less likelihood of seeking consultation. Results Our sample (N = 1215) was primarily female (85%) and Caucasian (83%) with a mean age of 46 years and 17 years of practice. Among the sample, 293 (48.7%) RNs and 309 (51.3%) SWs reported access to an ethics consultation service. Amongst those with access, 2.8% (n = 17) personally experienced retaliation, 9.1% (n = 55) observed colleagues experience retaliation, 30.2% (n = 182) reported no experience with retaliation but considered it a realistic fear, and 50.8% (n = 305) did not perceive retaliation to be a problem. In logistic regression modeling, fear of retaliation was not associated with the likelihood (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.22–1.89) or frequency of requesting ethics consultation (OR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.27–2.38). Conclusion Fear of retaliation from seeking ethics consultation is common among nurses and social workers, nonetheless this fear is not associated with reduced requests for ethics consultation
Keywords Medicine & Public Health   History of Medicine   Ethics   Medical Law   Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-007-9105-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethical Decision Making in Nurses.Marcia L. Raines - 2000 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 2 (1):29-41.
What Triggers Requests for Ethics Consultations?G. DuVal - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 1):24-29.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (2):155-158.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Triggers Requests for Ethics Consultations?G. DuVal - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 1):24-29.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Can Ethics Consultation Be Saved? Ethics Consultation and Moral Consensus in a Democratic Society.J. Moreno - 2003 - In Mark P. Aulisio, Robert M. Arnold & Stuart J. Youngner (eds.), Ethics Consultation: From Theory to Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 23--35.
A Template for Peer Ethics Consultation.Michael C. Gottlieb - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):151 – 162.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #261,158 of 2,533,674 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,674 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes