Medieval mechanical devices

History of Science 13 (22):284-289 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Intentional states of mechanical devices.Berent Enc - 1982 - Mind 91 (April):161-182.
Infants' understanding of actions performed by mechanical devices.Ty W. Boyer, J. Samantha Pan & Bennett I. Bertenthal - 2011 - Cognition 121 (1):1-11.
Infants’ understanding of actions performed by mechanical devices.Ty W. Boyer, J. Samantha Pan & Bennett I. Bertenthal - 2011 - Cognition 121 (1):1-11.
Expertise differences in the mental representation of mechanical devices in engineering design.J. Moss, K. Kotovsky & J. Cagan - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (1):65-93.
A Democritean phenomenology for quantum scattering theory.H. Pierre Noyes - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (1):83-100.
Technology and the Wilderness Experience.Sarah Pohl - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):147-163.
The Bodily Incorporation of Mechanical Devices: Ethical and Religious Issues.Courtney S. Campbell, Lauren A. Clark, David Loy, James F. Keenan, Kathleen Matthews, Terry Winograd & Laurie Zoloth - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):229-239.
The Bodily Incorporation of Mechanical Devices: Ethical and Religious Issues.Courtney S. Campbell, Lauren A. Clark, David Loy, James F. Keenan, Kathleen Matthews, Terry Winograd & Laurie Zoloth - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):268-280.
The machines of Francesco Di Giorgio: Demonstrations of the world.Alice C. Guess - 1998 - Dissertation, Mcgill University
How safe are new medical devices?Stephen J. Humphreys - 2012 - Research Ethics 8 (1):43-48.
As time went by, of course, this mechanical ether came to seem less and less necessary, or plausible, and the electromagnetic field emerged as a new, non-mechanical, concept; its vibrations were supposed not to require the existence of any underlying mechanical contraption. Gravity was also naturally regarded as a field theory. A. [REVIEW]Ijr Aitchison - 1991 - In Simon Saunders & Harvey R. Brown (eds.), The Philosophy of Vacuum. Oxford University Press. pp. 159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-19

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references