Approaches to Global Ethics: Michael Sandel's Justice and Li Zehou's Harmony

Philosophy East and West 66 (3):720-738 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In recent years Michael Sandel’s communitarian criticism of John Rawls’s theory of justice has gained much attention in philosophical circles. Specifically, he takes issue with the conception of the self—implicit in Rawls’s “veil of ignorance”: an extraction of the individual from their social environment, which creates an “unencumbered self” that is then used to theorize about justice. Sandel believes that some social ties are so deeply embedded in the human experience that even hypothetical isolation of the individual is likely to lead ethical thinking astray. Additionally, he thinks that human emotions and other circumstantial considerations need to be taken into account. His emphasis on the situated self has...



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberalism and the limits of justice.Michael Sandel - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (6):336-343.
Must the Family Be Just?Brian Penrose - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
Huiying Sangde'er ji qita 回應桑德爾及其他 by Li Zehou.R. A. Carleo - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (3):1027-1029.
Principles or imagination? Two approaches to global justice.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):203 – 221.
Freedom of the Encumbered Self: Michael Sandel and Iris Murdoch.C. Fred Alford - 2005 - Contemporary Political Theory 4 (2):109-128.
Justice: a reader.J. Sandel Michael (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is there a problem with enhancement?Frances M. Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14.


Added to PP

29 (#432,070)

6 months
1 (#511,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?