Is “Globalizing Democracy” Possible?

Radical Philosophy Today 2006:255-260 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Comparing Carol Gould’s Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights to other recent discussions of global justice, Dahbour argues that her work offers two important theoretical departures: It grounds global rights and democracy along foundationalist rather than constructivist lines; and it rejects the notion that just global institutions require the equal input of all those affected by their activities, defending instead that only those engaged in the “common activity” of institutions should participate in the decision-making. On the basis of this common activity guideline, Dahbour argues against Gould that we should not move toward “globalizing democracy” (or political cosmopolitanism) because globalization has been mostly a project of U.S. Empire. Instead, furthering democracy andhuman rights requires the strengthening of local democracy and support of the global justice movement as an antiglobalization movement. [Abstract prepared by the Editors.]

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
22 (#521,808)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Omar Dahbour
Hunter College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references