Commentary on the paper by HC Byerly and RE Michod,“Fitness and Evolutionary Explanation”

Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):23-27 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Byerly and Michod on fitness.John Maynard Smith - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):37-37.
Fitness as a Function.Henry Byerly - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:494 - 501.
Commentary on Byerly and Michod.James G. Lennox - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):33-37.
The evolution of theoretically useful traits.Rowland Stout - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (4):529-540.
A Defense of Propensity Interpretations of Fitness.Robert C. Richardson & Richard M. Burian - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:349 - 362.
Can fitness differences be a cause of evolution?Grant Ramsey - 2013 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 5 (20130604):1-13.
The propensity interpretation of fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-06

Downloads
39 (#388,687)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references