- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Accountability and pediatric physician-researchers: are theoretical models compatible with Canadian lived experience?
Christine Czoli, Michael Da Silva, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Lori D'Agincourt-Canning, Christy Simpson, Katherine Boydell, Natalie Rashkovan & Sharon Vanin
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6:15 (2011)
Abstract
Physician-researchers are bound by professional obligations stemming from both the role of the physician and the role of the researcher. Currently, the dominant models for understanding the relationship between physician-researchers' clinical duties and research duties fit into three categories: the similarity position, the difference position and the middle ground. The law may be said to offer a fourthAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- europepmc.org
(no proxy) - link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [3] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [4] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [5] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com (no proxy)
- peh-med.com (no proxy)
- peh-med.com [2] (no proxy)
- peh-med.com [3] (no proxy)
- peh-med.com [4] (no proxy)
- peh-med.com [5] (no proxy)
- doaj.org (no proxy)
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-10-06
Downloads
89 (#182,505)
6 months
13 (#147,845)
2011-10-06
Downloads
89 (#182,505)
6 months
13 (#147,845)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Mitigating Challenges in Dual-Role Consent: Honoring Patient Preferences to Discuss Research Participation With Someone They Know.Akshay Sharma & Liza-Marie Johnson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):30-32.
References found in this work
Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy.Charles Fried - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer.
The Ancillary‐Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers: An Ethical Framework for Thinking about the Clinical Care that Researchers Owe Their Subjects.Henry S. Richardson & Leah Belsky - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (1):25-33.
What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.
Bench to bedside: Mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (2):30-42.
The clinician-investigator: Unavoidable but manageable tension.Howard Brody & Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):329-346.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-v4fj8 uwo