Ambiguities and irresolvable tensions in the Ada: A reply to Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):225-235 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay comments on the articles by Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers. It extends their analyses and concludes that consistency and the total absence of conflict may be unavailable when one interprets and applies the Americans with Disabilities Act

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adolescents as Doubly-Vulnerable Research Subjects.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):50-52.
Impairment, disadvantage, and equality: A reply to Anita Silvers.David Wasserman - 1994 - Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (3):181-188.
Review. [REVIEW]Loretta Kopelman - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
Introduction.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):121-126.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Loretta Kopelman & Gregory E. Pence - 1985 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (2).
Children as Research Subjects: A Dilemma.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):723-744.
Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):351 – 378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
26 (#571,586)

6 months
2 (#1,114,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary Ann Cutter
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references