Three Angry Men

Phables (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A short play wherein three pregnant (previously) anti-abortion men consider the arguments for and against abortion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.Anna Christensen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):22-25.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Abortion, competing entitlements, and parental responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
The parenthood argument.William Simkulet - 2017 - Bioethics 32 (1):10-15.
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge.Karl Ekendahl - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):273-274.
A Present Like Ours.Michael Davis - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):75-90.
Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours.Andrea Sauchelli - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (3):317-332.
A future like ours revisited.M. T. Brown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):192-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-08

Downloads
173 (#109,378)

6 months
57 (#74,893)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Cushing
University of Michigan - Flint

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references