Philosophical Studies 176 (7):1693-1709 (2019)

Authors
Abstract
In population ethics, Narveson’s dictum states: morality favours making people happy, but is neutral about making happy people. The thought is intuitively appealing; for example, it prohibits creating new people at the expense of those who already exist. However, there are well-known obstacles to accommodating Narveson’s dictum within a standard framework of overall betterness: any attempt to do so violates very plausible formal features of betterness. Therefore, the prevailing view is that the dictum is off-limits to consequentialists, who are thereby committed to the unsavoury normative consequences of denying it. We argue against the prevailing view, by showing that Narveson’s dictum can be accommodated within “multidimensional” consequentialism. The key move is to deny the normative preeminence of overall betterness, instead taking moral decision-making to rest directly on “respects” of betterness. The multidimensional approach permits a consequentialist account of Narveson’s dictum in which betterness is well-behaved. It also yields a new way to think of the connection between goodness and rightness, thus revealing new terrain in the space of possible moral theories.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1085-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Weighing Lives.John Broome - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox.Larry S. Temkin - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (2):138-187.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Harms and Objections.Michael McDermott - 2019 - Analysis 79 (3):436-448.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Narveson on Liberty and Equality.Allan Gibbard - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):249-258.
Peter Abelard's Theory of the Proposition.Kevin Stephen Guilfoy - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Washington
Terrorism and Collective Responsibility: A Response to Narveson and Rosenbaum.Seumas Miller - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):263-281.
Thinking About the Needy: A Reprise.Larry S. Temkin - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (4):409-458.
What is Hume's Dictum, and Why Believe It?Jessica Wilson - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):595 - 637.
Model Theory, Hume's Dictum, and the Priority of Ethical Theory.Jack Woods & Barry Maguire - 2017 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4:419-440.
Reply to Narveson.Peter Van Inwagen - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (1):89-98.
Consequentialism and Commitment.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):380–403.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-26

Total views
34 ( #334,834 of 2,504,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes