‘Or both’: A reply to Lajevardi on the alleged exclusivity of disjunction in English

Analysis (1):29-30 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Exclusivists interpret the ‘or’ of English (and other natural languages) exclusively, but may wish to introduce an inclusive sense of disjunction. A common natu.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Illusion of Exclusivity.Conor McHugh - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):1117-1136.
Belief and aims.Conor McHugh - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (3):425-439.
Why an expressivist should not commit to commitment-semantics.Jorn Sonderholm - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):403–409.
Defending Exclusivity.Sophie Archer - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):326-341.
Exemplification with disjunction.Anna Szabolcsi - 2020 - Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XXXII: 321-329 32.
Aims and Exclusivity.Ema Sullivan-Bissett - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):721-731.
The genealogy of disjunction.Raymond Earl Jennings - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The disjunction thesis and necessary connection.Zamani Mohsen - 2023 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (3):318-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin L. Curtis
Nottingham Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations