Connected Learning and the Foundations of Psychometrics: A Rejoinder

Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (1):17-29 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper continues an exchange between its author and Andrew Davis. Part I addresses the attribution and ontological status of mental constructs and argues that philosophical work on these topics does not undermine high stakes testing. Part II examines the significance for testing of the connectedness of meaningful learning. Part III addresses the high stakes in high stakes testing in connection with the risk entailed by limited scoring reliability. It concludes that there is no straightforward relationship between the magnitude of what is at stake for students and teachers and the threshold of acceptable reliability in scoring.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sociobiology and psychometrics: Do they really need each other?John Rust - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):117 – 129.
Epistemology, Pedagogy, Assessment and Learning Analytics.Simon Knight, Simon Buckingham Shum & Karen Littleton - 2013 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
Learning as Learning How to Feel.Matt Silliman - 2016 - Social Philosophy Today 32:47-58.
Epistemic anxiety and adaptive invariantism.Jennifer Nagel - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):407-435.


Added to PP

39 (#419,517)

6 months
10 (#306,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Randall R. Curren
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations