Brecht

In Paisley Livingston & Carl Plantinga (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Film. Routledge (2008)

Abstract

This paper focuses on philosophical issues regarding Bertolt Brecht's engagement with film. Topics that are discussed include: Brecht's influence on filmmaking and film theory; the claim that Brecht held that mainstream films place viewers under the "illusion" that what they are watching on screen is real; Brecht's rejection of empathy; and the linkage of film form and socially critical content.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-16

Downloads
40 (#287,804)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angela Curran
Kansas State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Noël Carroll.Maisie Knew - 2008 - In Paisley Livingston & Carl R. Plantinga (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film. Routledge. pp. 196.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Brecht's Criticisms of Aristotle's Aesthetics of Tragedy.Angela Curran - 2001 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (2):167–184.
A Just Medium: Empathy and Detachment in Historical Understanding.Constantine Sandis - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):179-200.
Brecht and Postmodernism.R. Friedrich - 1999 - Philosophy and Literature 23 (1):44-64.
Feyerabend's Epistemology and Brecht's Theory of the Drama.S. G. Couvalis - 1987 - Philosophy and Literature 11 (1):117-123.
Georg Lukács or Bertolt Brecht?Bela Kiralyfalvi - 1985 - British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (4):340-348.
The Political Philosophy of Arnold Brecht.Arnold Brecht - 1954 - New York[Exposition Press].