Asserting disadvantaged communities’ deliberative agency in a media-saturated society

Theory and Society 50 (4):657-677 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article investigates how communities experiencing poverty can exercise their deliberative agency in a media-saturated society. While empirical research on deliberative democracy tends to focus on the role of mini-publics in giving low-income households the opportunity in small-scale, carefully designed forums to characterise, justify, and reflect on their views, such conception of deliberative agency gets lost in the picture once deliberative theory begins thinking in systemic terms. This article proposes a remedy to this theoretical and analytical gap by characterising the hypermediated character of the deliberative system and identifying possibilities for communities experiencing poverty to maximise the affordances of digital media for them to make an appearance in the public sphere, speak in their own voice, and carry the embodied and storied character of their arguments. I present two illustrative cases drawing on the experiences of families with low income directly affected by the bloody war on drugs in the Philippines who utilise photojournalism and online music streaming to break in the public sphere and engage in systemic deliberations about the drug war. These examples demonstrate how communities experiencing poverty express their deliberative agency amidst fear, trauma and deprivation and democratise a media-saturated deliberative system under an increasingly authoritarian regime. Overall, this article hopes to strengthen the link between normative media studies and democratic theory and offering possibilities for reforming the public sphere that recognises the poor’s deliberative agency.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining agency after implicit bias.Naomi Alderson - 2017 - Philosophical Psychology 30 (5):645-656.
Deliberation and media.Jürg Steiner - 2011 - Archives de Philosophie du Droit 54:193-205.
Information professionals serving disadvantaged communities.Michel J. Menou & Kingo Mchombu - 2007 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 5 (2/3):140-154.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):129-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-08

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Agency as conversion process.Giacomo Bazzani - forthcoming - Theory and Society:1-21.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis F. Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
Religion in the public sphere.Jürgen Habermas - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):1–25.
Religion in the Public Sphere.Jürgen Habermas - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):1-25.
Regarding the pain of others.Susan Sontag - 2003 - Diogène 201 (1):127-.

View all 15 references / Add more references