Sobre a distinção entre prudência e moralidade em Kant e Crusius: considerações sobre a origem da doutrina do imperativo categórico

Studia Kantiana 17 (1):101-126 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The extent of the originality and relevance of Kant's ethics is undeniable. But it is not so evident the fact that the Kant's moral philosophy as a whole was not suddenly built, but it was dependent on a profound debate with the philosophical tradition, especially with the German scholastic tradition, a debate which led to the assimilation or appropriation of several of its aspects. With special regard to the history of the development of the categorical imperative, it is not possible to be indifferent to the influence of the practical philosophy of the Enlightenment German philosopher and theologian, Christian August Crusius. The aim of this article is thus to try to identify, taking into account the distinction of praxis in problematic and moral and the contrast between prudence and morality, some points of intersection between the moral philosophy of Crusius and Kant in its origin.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sobre a moralidade do direito em Kant.Joãosinho Beckenkamp - 2009 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 8 (1):63-83.
Schopenhauer's Interpretation of the Categorical Imperative.Peter Welsen - 2005 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3/4):757 - 772.
Can Positive Duties be Derived from Kant’s Categorical Imperative?Michael Yudanin - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):595-614.
Unifying the Categorical Imperative.Marcus Arvan - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):217-225.
Understanding Kant's Ethics.Michael Cholbi - 2016 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Conception of Inner Value.Oliver Sensen - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):262-280.
Schopenhauer and Kant.Peter Welsen - 2005 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3):757-772.
The Religious Significance of Kant’s Ethics.Jacqueline Mariña - 2001 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (2):179-200.
A Concepção De Justiça Penal Na Doutrina Do Direito De Kant.Robinson Santos - 2011 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 10 (3):103-114.


Added to PP

481 (#36,619)

6 months
85 (#44,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruno Cunha
Federal University of São João Del Rei

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2019.Margit Ruffing - 2021 - Kant Studien 112 (4):623-660.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references