Theory of mind in utterance interpretation: the case from clinical pragmatics

Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The cognitive basis of utterance interpretation is an area that continues to provoke intense theoretical debate among pragmatists. That utterance interpretation involves some type of mind-reading or theory of mind (ToM) is indisputable. However, theorists are divided on the exact nature of this ToM-based mechanism. In this paper, it is argued that the only type of ToM-based mechanism that can adequately represent the cognitive basis of utterance interpretation is one which reflects the rational, intentional, holistic character of interpretation. Such a ToM-based mechanism is supported on conceptual and empirical grounds. Empirical support for this view derives from the study of children and adults with pragmatic disorders. Specifically, three types of clinical case are considered. In the first case, evidence is advanced which indicates that individuals with pragmatic disorders exhibit deficits in reasoning and the use of inferences. These deficits compromise the ability of children and adults with pragmatic disorders to comply with the rational dimension of utterance interpretation. In the second case, evidence is presented which suggests that subjects with pragmatic disorders struggle with the intentional dimension of utterance interpretation. This dimension extends beyond the recognition of communicative intentions to include the attribution of a range of cognitive and affective mental states that play a role in utterance interpretation. In the third case, evidence is presented that children and adults with pragmatic disorders struggle with the holistic character of utterance interpretation. This serves to distort the contexts in which utterances are processed for their implicated meanings. The paper concludes with some thoughts about the role of theorizing in relation to utterance interpretation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acerca del monoproposicionalismo imperante en Semántica y Pragmática.Kepa Korta - 2007 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 32 (2):37-55.
Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind‐reading.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (1-2):3–23.
Informal pragmatics and linguistic creativity.John Collier - 2014 - South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):121-129.
Speaker’s meaning and non-cancellability.Guangwu Feng - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):117-138.
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics.François Recanati - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Pragmatics and Cognition: Intentions and Pattern Recognition in Context.Marco Mazzone - 2009 - International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2):321-347.
What is a context of utterance?Christopher Gauker - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 91 (2):149-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
20 (#656,247)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Louise Cummings
Hong Kong Polytechnic University

References found in this work

Direct Reference: From Language to Thought.François Récanati - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
The Rediscovery of the Mind.John Searle - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):201-207.
Representation and Reality.H. Putnam - 1990 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 52 (1):168-168.
Representation and Reality.Robert Stalnaker - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):359.
Direct Reference: From Language to Thought.Jennifer M. Saul - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178):134-135.

View all 24 references / Add more references