Innate modules vs innate learning biases

Cognitive Processing (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proponents of the dominant paradigm in evolutionary psychology argue that a viable evolutionary cognitive psychology requires that specific cognitive capacities be heritable and “quasi-independent” from other heritable traits, and that these requirements are best satisfied by innate cognitive modules. We argue here that neither of these are required in order to describe and explain how evolution shaped the mind

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is mind blind?Nicholas Nicastro - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):745-746.
Innateness and Domain Specificity.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 105 (2):191-210.
Cognitive evolutionary psychology without representational nativism.Denise D. Cummins, Robert C. Cummins & Pierre Poirier - 2003 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 15 (2):143-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
275 (#70,839)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Charles Cummins
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references