Gitik Moti. The strength of the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis. Annals of pure and applied logic, vol. 51 , pp. 215–240 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):340-340 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2275527

Other Versions

original Cummings, James (1995) "Review: Moti Gitik, The Strength of the Failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis". Journal of Symbolic Logic 60(1):340-340

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,576

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gitik Moti. The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from O = K ++. Annals of pure and applied logic, vol. 43 , pp. 209–234. [REVIEW]W. J. Mitchell - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):344-344.
ABRAMSKY, S., Domain theory in logical form (l-2) l-77 FARMER, WM, A unification-theoretic method for investigat-ing the k-provability problem (3) 173-214 GITIK, M., The strength of the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis (3) 215-240. [REVIEW]D. Miller - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51:301.
Gitik Moti. On the Mitchell and Rudin-Keisler orderings of ultrafilters. Annals of pure and applied logic, vol. 39 , pp. 175–197. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):338-339.
James Cummings. A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 329 , pp. 1–39. - James Cummings. Strong ultrapowers and long core models. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 58 , pp. 240–248. - James Cummings. Coherent sequences versus Radin sequences. Annals of pure and applied logic, vol. 70 , pp. 223–241. - James Cummings, Matthew Foreman, and Menachem Magidor. Squares, scales and stationary reflection. Journal of mathematical logic, vol. 1 , pp. 35–98. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):550-552.
Itay Neeman. Aronszajn trees and failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9, no. 1 , pp. 139–157. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property at אּω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 1 , pp. 279–290. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 51, no. 5-6 , pp. 553–562. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at אּω2. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 3 , pp. 934–946. - Spencer Unger. Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 52, no. 5-6 , pp. 483–496. - Itay Neeman. The tree property up to אּω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. vol. 79, no. 2 , pp. 429–459. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):188-192.
Moti Gitik and Menachem Magidor. The singular cardinal hypothesis revisited. Set theory of the continuum, edited by H. Judah, W. Just, and H. Woodin, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute publications, vol. 26, Springer-Verlag, New York etc. 1992, pp. 243–279. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):339-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
20 (#922,075)

6 months
10 (#286,670)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references