Dignity, contractualism and consequentialism

Utilitas 20 (4):383-408 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kantian respect for persons is based on the special status and dignity of humanity. There are, however, at least three distinct kinds of interpretation of the principle of respect for the dignity of persons: the contractualist conception, the substantive conception and the direct conception. Contractualist theories are the most common and familiar interpretation. The contractualist assumes that some form of consent or agreement is the crucial factor that is required by respect for persons. The substantive conceptions of dignity, on the other hand, treat the concept of dignity as a substantive value that justifies a deontological conception of respect for persons. A third conception of respect for the dignity of persons, the conception that I favor, focuses directly on the special value of our rational nature. According to this consequentialist conception, we respect the dignity of persons by promoting the flourishing of rational nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-governance and cooperation.Robert H. Myers - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Human Dignity and Non-Utilitarian Consequentialist "Ethics of Social Consequences".Vasil Gluchman - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (7):159-165.
Contractualism and Consequentialism.Philip Pettit - 2000 - Theoria 66 (3):228-236.
Contractualism and the foundations of morality.Nicholas Southwood - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A deliberative model of contractualism.Nicholas Southwood - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):183-208.
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.
Kantian consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
Undignified bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2009 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
325 (#59,993)

6 months
39 (#94,244)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Respect.Robin S. Dillon - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
Value in Ethics and Economics.Paul Seabright - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (2):303.

View all 14 references / Add more references