Credibilistic Loss Aversion Nash Equilibrium for Bimatrix Games with Triangular Fuzzy Payoffs

Complexity 2018:1-16 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inspired by Shalev’s model of loss aversion, we investigate the effect of loss aversion on a bimatrix game where the payoffs in the bimatrix game are characterized by triangular fuzzy variables. First, we define three solution concepts of credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria, and their existence theorems are presented. Then, three sufficient and necessary conditions are given to find the credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria. Moreover, the relationship among the three credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria is discussed in detail. Finally, for2×2bimatix game with triangular fuzzy payoffs, we investigate the effect of loss aversion coefficients and confidence levels on the three credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria. It is found that an increase of loss aversion levels of a player leads to a decrease of his/her own payoff. We also find that the equilibrium utilities of players are decreasing as their own confidence levels when players employ the optimistic value criterion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Loss Aversion in Bimatrix Games.Bram Driesen, Andrés Perea & Hans Peters - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):367-391.
Probe and Adjust.Simon M. Huttegger - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (2):195-200.
Games between humans and AIs.Stephen J. DeCanio - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (4):557-564.
Loss Aversion and Bargaining.Jonathan Shalev - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
Games, goals, and bounded rationality.Leigh Tesfatsion - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (2):149-175.
The relevance of Nash equilibrium to psychiatric disorders.Tassos Patokos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):245-258.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
91 (#183,705)

6 months
68 (#63,379)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Loss Aversion and Bargaining.Jonathan Shalev - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
On Loss Aversion in Bimatrix Games.Bram Driesen, Andrés Perea & Hans Peters - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):367-391.

Add more references