Sensationalized Philosophy: A Reply to Marquis's "Why Abortion is Immoral"

Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):262 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2026833

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sensationalized philosophy: A reply to Marquis's "why abortion is immoral".Ann E. Cudd - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):262-264.
Why I Was Never a Zygote.Robert Lane - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):63-83.
Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion.Mary Clayton Coleman - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):89-93.
Abortion, Infanticide, and the Changing Grounds of the Wrongness of Killing: Reply to Don Marquis's "Reiman on Abortion".Jeffrey Reiman - 1998 - Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (2):168-174.
Abortion, competing entitlements, and parental responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
Killing, abortion, and contraception: A reply to Marquis.Alastair Norcross - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):268-277.
Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Abortion and the argument from innocence.Marvin Kohl - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):147-151.
Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the 'future like ours' argument.Carson Strong - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (9):567-569.
On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652.
You can't lose what you ain't never had: A reply to Marquis on abortion.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (1):59-72.
The Marquis de Sade and induced abortion.A. D. Farr - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (1):7-10.
property Rights Of Fetuses: Ontological Problems In The Deprivation Argument Against Abortion.Jesse Unruh - 2007 - Florida Philosophical Review 7 (1):108-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
63 (#246,899)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ann Cudd
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.Anna Christensen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):22-25.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Impairing the Impairment Argument.Kyle van Oosterum & Emma J. Curran - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references