Cambridge University Press (1731)
AbstractRalph Cudworth (1617-1688) deserves recognition as one of the most important English seventeenth-century philosophers after Hobbes and Locke. In opposition to Hobbes, Cudworth proposes an innatist theory of knowledge which may be contrasted with the empirical position of his younger contemporary Locke, and in moral philosophy he anticipates the ethical rationalists of the eighteenth century. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality is his most important work, and this volume makes it available, together with his shorter Treatise of Freewill, in its first modern edition, with a historical introduction, a chronology of his life, and an essay on further reading.
0824017684 0521473624 115104573X 1605974897 1013778820 1013366506 1333808127 037128323X
Similar books and articles
A Letter Concerning Toleration ; the Second Treatise of Government ; an Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1984 - Franklin Library.
The True Intellectual System of the Universe: Wherein All the Reason and Philosophy of Atheism Is Confuted and Its Impossibility Demonstrated.Ralph Cudworth - 1845 - Thoemmes Press.
An Alexandrian Platonist Against Dualism: Alexander of Lycopolis' Treatise "Critique of the Doctrines of Manichaeus".Alexander of Lycopolis - 1974 - Brill.
Stoics Against Stoics In Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill.John Sellars - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):935-952.
On Time and Imagination: De Spiritu Fantastico. De Tempore.Robert Kilwardby - 1987 - Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press.
Back to the Texts.Stuart Brown - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):269 – 273.
A Treatise of Freewill and an Introduction to Cudworth's Treatise.Ralph Cudworth - 1838 - Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Realism and Reduction: The Quest for Robustness.Mark Schroeder - 2005 - Philosophers' Imprint 5:1-18.
Could Morality Have a Source?Chris Heathwood - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-19.
References found in this work
No references found.