Evidence‐based medicine and epistemological imperialism: narrowing the divide between evidence and illness

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):868-872 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine has been rapidly and widely adopted because it claims to provide a method for determining the safety and efficacy of medical therapies and public health interventions more generally. However, as others have noted, EBM may be riven through with cultural bias, both in the generation of evidence and in its translation. We suggest that technological and scientific advances in medicine accentuate and entrench these cultural biases, to the extent that they may invalidate the evidence we have about disease and its treatment. This creates a significant ethical, epistemological and ontological challenge for medicine.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,589

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine.R. E. Ashcroft - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):131-135.
The origins of medical evidence: Communication and experimentation.Joachim Widder - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):99-104.
Can Evidence-Based Medicine Implicitly Rely on Current Concepts of Disease or Does It Have to Develop Its Own Definition?Andreas Gerber - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics: The Journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics 33 (7):394-399.
Evidence‐based medicine and its role in ethical decision‐making.Pascal Borry, Paul Schotsmans & Kris Dierickx - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):306-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
83 (#286,171)

6 months
16 (#271,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?